TW Viewpoint | Do Schools Discriminate Against Boys?

September 6, 2017 | Stuart Wachowicz

Subscribe Today! If you would like to receive weekly emails informing you when new commentaries and Tomorrow's World Viewpoint videos are uploaded, please subscribe to our e-newsletter.

Boys or girls: which of the two are the most intelligent? Exam results suggest that girls are overtaking boys across the academic spectrum. But, is this really the case?

Let me begin by stating that it is not within the scope of this Viewpoint to argue either gender as being more intelligent than the other. Rather, the question is: "Does the classroom provide an even playing field, or are the current fads in education leaving one gender behind?"

In an article in The Province (June 12, 2014) entitled "The Guys Crisis: Boys are falling badly behind the girls at school," author Paul Luke states, "By high school, girls' grade point average outshines that of boys. In Canada, women make up almost 60 percent of university students."

He explains the phenomenon by suggesting that for too long the needs of girls were overlooked in school and now that things are more equitable, girls outshine boys in learning.

Recently, however, Dr. Jim Dueck, author, former Assistant Deputy Minister of Education for the province of Alberta, and former head of Accountability and Student Assessment, performed a revealing analysis on current practices in student assessment.

The results were not only remarkable but very disturbing, exposing what might well be an institutional suppression of the performance of male students.

Dr. Dueck based his analysis on the results of Provincial Diploma Examinations, written by all twelfth-grade students in core subject areas.

These standardized examinations are used to determine entrance qualifications to post-secondary programs.

Historically, the examinations make up 50 percent of the students' final mark, with the other 50 percent being assigned by the course instructor.

Given the examinations are carefully designed to measure the students' understanding of the curriculum, there should be relatively little variation between the teacher-assigned mark and the mark received on the provincial examination.

However, as classroom instructional standards have declined due to significant increases in "progressive" or "discovery learning" strategies and less focus on direct instruction, it has been noted that the teacher-assigned marks have been disproportionately higher than the exam mark.

This is generally referred to as "mark inflation."

Dr. Dueck took the analysis a step further and writes, "While grade inflation is a serious problem because taxpayers are not receiving the level of education they believe was purchased, they are also unaware that males' marks are inflated significantly less.

Research now shows this discrimination against males is evident across North America and Europe."

His analysis of the June 2016 examination results demonstrates that the mark inflation rate for girls was consistently higher in English, Math, Biology, Physics and Social Studies (History).

Yet the results on the provincially-administered examination had males scoring equal to or higher on five out of six subjects.

Dr. Dueck adds, "This advantage translates into more scholarships and placements in prestigious universities, and explains why 11 Canadian universities now have a female population of more than 66%."

Regrettably, as Dr. Dueck points out, the tendency to inflate the educational results of female students seems endemic across Canada, the United States and western Europe.

The result, of course, is the significant and potentially catastrophic loss of academic participation of males in the future.

This not only will have massive economic consequences, but will also be extremely destabilizing from a social perspective.

In my experience as a Curriculum Director for one of Canada's largest school systems, I have witnessed this trend.

There is a growing body of research that serves to attribute the apparent advantage females enjoy in the public school system to their more compliant and passive behavior in the classroom.

Males are more likely to exhibit skepticism about subject matter and to challenge their instruction.

This behavioral difference, essential to scholarship, appears to be the source of negative discrimination in modern schools.

As Dr. Dueck points out, "Researchers attribute this female advantage to their more compliant behavior in the classroom. At issue is whether the knowledge of calculus, for example, should be conflated with classroom behavior?"

He wonders when governments will "come to understand their responsibility in this mess and reduce classroom teachers' ability to hamper males from competing on a level playing field."

Perhaps it is time for parents and all interested parties in society to realize they have become the unwitting victims of the ideological coercion of the educational "New Left."

Perhaps people should seek to return to the cultural values that created a strong, well-educated and stable society, in which the potential of young men and young women is developed outside of the framework of a system designed to suppress the potential of boys.

I am Stuart Wachowicz for Tomorrow's World Viewpoint.

To access articles, telecasts and booklets from Tomorrow's World visit our website

Watch Do Schools Discriminate Against Boys? on YouTube at Tomorrow's World Viewpoint